Sign in or 

| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JonPincus | Reports from the blogosphere | 18 | Nov 10 2008, 12:49 AM EST by LindaCA | ||||
|
Thread started: Nov 4 2008, 10:25 AM EST
Watch
use this thread to summarize and link to reports of voter suppression from various blogs ...
Show Last Reply
|
|||||||
| Anonymous | Beware Georgia DMV Telling you you are registered, when your not. | 2 | Nov 5 2008, 8:51 AM EST by Anonymous | ||||
|
|
Thread started: Nov 4 2008, 3:12 PM EST
Watch
In September I went to get my address changed on my license and to register to vote at the Department of Driver Services, Norcross, GA. I must have told the woman that waited on me about a half of dozen time to register me to vote, which she assured me she did. On Nov. fourth when I went to vote I was told that I was not register. The woman at the voting center told me that they have had over 200 complaints from DMV registered voters that they were not registered. The woman at the voting center told me to go back to the DMV Center and complain. Nothing was resolved. I did not get to vote that day!!!!!! I am very angry that DMV has taken away my right to vote!!!!! I can understand one or two mistakes, but over 200!!!!! Is this profiling?????
Show Last Reply
|
||||||
| Mome-rath | Nearly disenfranchised in Tacoma, WA because of a clerical error | 0 | Nov 4 2008, 7:17 PM EST by Mome-rath | ||||
|
Thread started: Nov 4 2008, 7:17 PM EST
Watch
I was nearly turned away because of a clerical error in my voter registration. My husband and I moved to Washington state in August, and immediately we registered to vote. It took nearly three months of
phone calls, re-registering, and error correction on the part of Pierce County, however, to get us registered. We originally requested to vote at the polls, but our first set of registration cards indicated that we would be voting absentee. I called the county auditor's office to correct the information, and they assured me that the system had been updated and we would receive new cards. The new cards came, but a few days later, absentee ballots arrived in the mail. Again, I called the county auditor to report the error. They told me that the system was correct, that we were to vote at the polls, and that we were to shred the absentee ballots. Today, we showed up at the polls, waited in line for over 90 minutes to vote, but when our turn came we were not allowed to vote because their records showed that we were to vote absentee. They tried to make us fill out provisional ballots, but we refused: we wanted to take zero chances with risking our ballots being rejected. I told them that I had called the county and had been told to vote at the polls. Their answer: "Well, that just means that you could vote at the polls with provisional ballots." Nobody ever told us that bit of information! I'm not sure if that answer was true or not. So we asked if we could still mail in the absentee ballots, which we hadn't gotten around to shredding yet. They said yes, as long as they were postmarked today. So in the end, we were able to vote, but the fact that registration and voting was so difficult and fraught with misinformation and incompetence is appalling. |
|||||||
| Anonymous | Indiana voters | 0 | Nov 4 2008, 6:36 PM EST by Anonymous | ||||
|
|
Thread started: Nov 4 2008, 6:36 PM EST
Watch
I know of quite a few people who were arrested monday and over the weekend for traffic tickets. My girlfriend son is 19 and this is his first time voting, well it would have been. The police came to his job to lock him up for a traffic ticket and he cannot get out until he is seen in court. So even if he posted his $5,000 bail he wouldn't be let go. All this over a $135 ticket from 9 months ago. He says most everyone in the holding is around his age and in for the same thing. He lives in Carmel Indiana but the same thing happen to my friend who lives in Ft.Wayne Indiana..How sneaky is that.
|
||||||
| Anonymous | FULTON COUNTY, GA - FORCED TO VOTE PROVISIONAL | 1 | Nov 4 2008, 5:00 PM EST by Anonymous | ||||
|
|
Thread started: Nov 4 2008, 4:06 PM EST
Watch
I am a first-time voter who registered in Fulton County, GA; mailed my registration and had it postmarked by the deadline. This morning I contacted the Fulton County Election Office to verify my registration status. I was told that yes, I was registered, and given the polling location (which I already knew from looking it up beforehand, but I wanted to verify with them.) When I arrived at the polling location, I was not found in their system. The manager of the polling location looked on her various other lists and I was on none of them. She tried to call some phone number to have it verified but after 5 minutes stated that it was too busy for her to get through the line. I was forced to vote provisional and was extremely unhappy about it. I went home, but then went back with my father and complained. They were apologetic this time and gave us some phone numbers to call. After I got home again, I was more angry and left a message with CNN's voter complaint hotline (1-877-462-6608), and contacted the election office again, who once again confirmed to me that I was registered. Unfortunately since I had already cast my ballot, there was nothing I could do to change it.
The current voting system is messed up. How can I be in the actual county's database but not in the polling location's? It is an inferior, backwards system that needs rehauling. The polling location I was at was not even busy at all, but I saw that other provisionals had been cast before I had gotten there, so others probably went through the same crap. Also, though it may be irrelevant, the poll location manager was rather unhelpful and condescending to me, and also seemed to hint that I registered too late, though I know I registered before the deadline. I'm extremely unhappy with my first voting experience.
Show Last Reply
|
||||||
| JonPincus | Reports from Twitter Vote Report | 3 | Nov 4 2008, 2:38 PM EST by Hwaisbren | ||||
|
Thread started: Nov 4 2008, 9:57 AM EST
Watch
if you see tweets in TVR that reflect voter suppression, please add them to this thread ...
Show Last Reply
|
|||||||
| Anonymous | New York City | 0 | Nov 4 2008, 12:56 PM EST by Anonymous | ||||
|
|
Thread started: Nov 4 2008, 12:56 PM EST
Watch
Republican poll watcher at my Jackson Heights polling location standing by the entrance and asking forcefully and repeatedly if people entering have ID. When confronted by the polling supervisor he lies, says he didn't ask for ID. Many of the voters are two-and-three-job-working immigrant Americans who could lose the time, and so the right, to vote if they don't have their ID with them.
|
||||||
| Anonymous | Chicago workers thought I should vote provisional due to their error | 0 | Nov 4 2008, 9:43 AM EST by Anonymous | ||||
|
|
Thread started: Nov 4 2008, 9:43 AM EST
Watch
I went to the polling place and wasn't on the list they keep. I had my voter reg. card with me, but the number to call was busy. They had me complete the paperwork for a provisional ballot, but I was able to connect with the Chicago board of elections, and was also told to vote provisionally. I argued that I should be able to cast a regular ballot, and since they found me on another list (they had two additional lists of voters, created according to absentee ballots cast, I think.) I was on that one list as someone who can vote there, so they let me cast my ballot on the sequoia touch-screen machine. I was the first to do this, since the machine had no legs and wasn't set up at 6:15am when I arrived. They had it up a little after 8am, so I voted that way. All told, the process took 1 hour, 45 minutes including about 20 minutes in the initial line. I was finally able to vote with a regular ballot, but had to fight to make that happen. Our polling place lacked judges, since three simply never showed up. They tried hard, but the process is quite complicated. In the time I spent waiting, there were three of us who were properly registered, but who were not on the poll list. In the time I spent waiting, there appeared to only be about 25 ballots cast. The problems we were having forced others to wait who were on the poll list. It's a scary thing, and a real shame! We need to fix our voting systems!
|
||||||
| Anonymous | Brewster County, Texas, Voting issues - AGAIN | 0 | Nov 2 2008, 1:55 PM EST by Anonymous | ||||
|
|
Thread started: Nov 2 2008, 1:55 PM EST
Watch
Early voting in Marathon, Texas was incredibly disappointing.
The Poll, scheduled to be open at 0900, was not open until 0935. This would not have annoyed me except that in the 2008 primary election the Marathon ballot box was temporarily lost resulting in a legal investigation. One Poll worker was at the Poll on time, but did not have the key to open the door to the Community Center. About two dozen people left before the Polls opened. I was approximately the 7th voter and while I voted, it was obvious that the assigned Poll worker did not know how to active the electronic voting machine. After I voted, a voter informed me that the Marathon voter registration list was not at the voter registration table. I returned inside and inquired about the Marathon voter registration list and discovered that it had JUST been located. In addition, one Poll worker asked the only other Poll worker if a group of high school observers, that were being given a tour of the inside area where voting was actively happening, could watch them cast their vote on the electronic voting machine. In reviewing the Texas poll worker on-line course, I discovered that most of the basic learning objectives were not followed: room layout; the electronic voting machine facing the door; no distance markers; no voter rights posters; allowing non-voters in the voting area; a poll working wanting to allow non-voters watch them vote. This experience shook my faith in the security and professionalism of our current democratic process. In casting one of the most important votes in my adult life, I came away less confident in our election system. |
||||||
| Anonymous | Voter Registration Problems in Harrisonburg, VA | 0 | Oct 31 2008, 1:29 AM EDT by Anonymous | ||||
|
|
Thread started: Oct 31 2008, 1:29 AM EDT
Watch
1 - Many registrations rejected without explanation because of "irregularities" on the forms
2 - Student rejected for using PO Box (valid dorm address on JMU campus) as home address, that's where he lives 3 - Young woman says her rejected form was changed after she turned it in 4 - Top Obama volunteer's form mysteriously lost, then found after registration deadline 5 - Stack of registrations went missing and were later rejected Suspected voter suppression going on at Harrisonburg City Registrar's office Local blog coverage, including video at hburgnews.com |
||||||
| Anonymous | Oregon Refuses to allow Voting by people with PO boxes | 1 | Oct 28 2008, 8:58 PM EDT by baratunde | ||||
|
|
Thread started: Oct 23 2008, 6:47 PM EDT
Watch
Some friends of mine live in eastern Oregon,
on property that is behind a locked gate and has no street address They have been denied the opportunity to vote because they use a PO box and do not have a street address There are three people of voting age living on this property
Show Last Reply
|
||||||
| Anonymous | Florida Absentee Ballots Collected By Fraudulent "Campaign Worker" | 0 | Oct 28 2008, 5:09 PM EDT by Anonymous | ||||
|
|
Thread started: Oct 28 2008, 5:09 PM EDT
Watch
Several supporters of the Democratic opponent of Congressman Diaz-Balart had their absentee ballots taken by a fraudulent "campaign worker" for the Democrat candidate (Garcia).
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/28/florida-absentee-ballots_n_138536.html In such a case it's critical to document the incident with the Secretary of State, and to obtain a second provisional ballot. When (and if) the first ballot appears the SoS must be pressured to investigate the case thoroughly. Fingerprinting the ballot, ascertaining if votes have been changed or if there was a pattern in the ballots returned, postmarks/codes, or other evidence as to where they were sent from. |
||||||
| Anonymous | victom of voter suppression Florida | 0 | Oct 26 2008, 9:22 AM EDT by Anonymous | ||||
|
|
Thread started: Oct 26 2008, 9:22 AM EDT
Watch
Hillsborough County Florida
I have voted for 20 years under my name in Florida and was listed as "Green Party" I have changed my address several times in the past, and had no problem. This year in February, I changed "my address" to my new address, and "my party" to Democrat. I never received a voter's card. So I called them and they said I was registered. I requested another card st this time in May. Again I received no voter's card. So, I and applied again in June. Since I still had no card for 3 months after my second request, I filled out the forms and mailed them in again. I finally gave up on receiving a card a few weeks ago. Then, Finally on Friday, ( a week and a half before election day) I received my voter's registration card. They changed the spelling of my name on it which is already in the computer. Now I will have to put up a fight to vote. It took them 8 months to finally send me their phony card with their typo/change of my name. |
||||||
| eddiegriffin | TEXAS - Misleading Voter Information | 1 | Oct 21 2008, 12:32 PM EDT by JonPincus | ||||
|
Thread started: Oct 21 2008, 10:57 AM EDT
Watch
Misleading Voter Information
There is a FALSE rumor going around by e-mail telling people that if they vote Straight Democratic Party, they must also cast a vote specifically for Barack Obama in order to have an Obama vote registered. THIS IS FALSE INFORMATION. The Obama Campaign has issued a statement concerning the false information in this email and encouraging Texas voters to cast a straight Democratic ballot. Click here to view the correct procedure for voting a straight Democratic ticket. The address on your driver's license does not have to match the address where you are registered in. In fact, you do not need to have a driver's license to vote.This rumor is aimed at causing confusion and suppressing the vote, especially among students and other people who move often. A voter registration certificate is enough on its own to allow you to vote.
Show Last Reply
|
|||||||
| rodtoriches | NEVADA - ALLEGATIONS -FRAUDULENT REGISTRATIONS | 1 | Oct 20 2008, 2:55 AM EDT by Anonymous | ||||
|
Thread started: Oct 10 2008, 10:46 PM EDT
Watch
Oct. 09, 2008
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal "For six months we have been handing the Board of Elections smoking gun after smoking gun, saying, 'We want you to prosecute these people,' " said Matthew Henderson, regional director of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, known as ACORN. "They sat on them, then staged this raid where they acted as if they didn't know us." Secretary of State Ross Miller (A REPUBLICAN), whose office is spearheading the probe, said it was necessary to collect evidence about serious problems that could prompt felony charges. ACORN is a nonpartisan organization, but it has a liberal political agenda and ties to Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama. But with the election less than a month away and Nevada one of a half-dozen top swing states, partisans rushed in to make hay of the controversy, with its dark undertones of dirty political tricks. The Republican National Committee on Wednesday pointed to reports of suspect ACORN work in states including Missouri, Connecticut, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Indiana, and questioned its motives and agenda. .Miller said although some evidence of fraud came from ACORN itself, other information came to authorities separately, leading to the determination that the organization's files had to be comprehensively examined to determine the scope of the problem. In the current election, ACORN's political action committee,has endorsed Obama for president. Because of those ties, Republicans link Obama to the spate of problems with ACORN and say he should have to answer for its alleged actions. "This is something they (the Obama campaign) should have to speak to, considering this group is engaged in systematic voter registration fraud not just in the state of Nevada but across the country," the RNC's Diaz said.
Show Last Reply
|
|||||||
| Anonymous | Judge Suppresses Report on Voting Machine Security | 1 | Oct 3 2008, 3:31 PM EDT by JonPincus | ||||
|
|
Thread started: Oct 3 2008, 11:31 AM EDT
Watch
Judge Suppresses Report on Voting Machine Security
By Andrew Appel - Posted on October 2nd, 2008 at 6:45 am A judge of the New Jersey Superior Court has prohibited the scheduled release of a report on the security and accuracy of the Sequoia AVC Advantage voting machine. Last June, Judge Linda Feinberg ordered Sequoia Voting Systems to turn over its source code to me (serving as an expert witness, assisted by a team of computer scientists) for a thorough examination. At that time she also ordered that we could publish our report 30 days after delivering it to the Court--which should have been today. Three weeks after we delivered the report, on September 24th Judge Feinberg ordered us not to release it. This is part of a lawsuit filed by the Rutgers Constitutional Litigation Clinic, seeking to decommission of all of New Jersey's voting computers. New Jersey mostly uses Sequoia AVC Advantage direct-recording electronic (DRE) models. None of those DREs can be audited: they do not produce a voter verified paper ballot that permit each voter to create a durable paper record of her electoral choices before casting her ballot electronically on a DRE. The legal basis for the lawsuit is quite simple: because there is no way to know whether the DRE voting computer is actually counting votes as cast, there is no proof that the voting computers comply with the constitution or with statutory law that require that all votes be counted as cast. The question of whether this report can legally be suppressed was already argued once in this Court, in June 2008, and the Court concluded then that it should be released..." READ MORE: http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/blog/appel/judge-suppresses-report-voting-machine-security
Show Last Reply
|
||||||
| Mistlethrush | AL GOP Pressure Ends Prisoner Registration Drive | 0 | Sep 21 2008, 2:12 PM EDT by Mistlethrush | ||||
|
Thread started: Sep 21 2008, 2:12 PM EDT
Watch
By Jay Reeves The Associate Press BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (AP) — Alabama Prisons Commissioner Richard Allen stopped a voter registration drive for inmates Thursday under pressure from the Alabama Republican Party. In a letter to state Republican Party Chairman Mike Hubbard, Allen said individuals conducting the program "were not doing anything for the inmates that they could not do themselves by simply contacting the Secretary of State's Office for the voter registration postcard." Still, Allen said he decided to stop the drive because of a section in the state code that prohibits using state-owned property to promote or advance candidates for election. NewsFlash Home | More Alabama News Ala. GOP pressure ends prisoner registration drive 9/18/2008, 6:22 p.m. CDT By JAY REEVES The Associated Press BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (AP) — Alabama Prisons Commissioner Richard Allen stopped a voter registration drive for inmates Thursday under pressure from the Alabama Republican Party. In a letter to state Republican Party Chairman Mike Hubbard, Allen said individuals conducting the program "were not doing anything for the inmates that they could not do themselves by simply contacting the Secretary of State's Office for the voter registration postcard." Still, Allen said he decided to stop the drive because of a section in the state code that prohibits using state-owned property to promote or advance candidates for election. Advertisement "While it is not clear that assisting voters to register would violate those provisions, I cannot expose departmental employees to that possibility," he wrote. Read the entire article here: http://www.al.com/newsflash/regional/index.ssf?/base/news-38/1221771858303520.xml&storylist=alabamanews |
|||||||
| Mistlethrush | Wal-Mart Warns Employees of Democratic Win | 0 | Sep 18 2008, 9:20 PM EDT by Mistlethrush | ||||
|
Thread started: Sep 18 2008, 9:20 PM EDT
Watch
I read this in the September 2008 edition of Today's garden Center, a trade magazine I get at my job. The Wall Street Journal recently reported that Wal-Mart is mobilizing its store managers and supervisors to warn them that a Democratic win in Noovember likely will result in legislation of companies like Wal-Mart easier. Wal-Mart is stressing the downside for workers if the stores become unionized but the company insists it is not telling employees how to vote. The article is here:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121755649066303381.html It's not exactly voter suppression but it seems to me to be at least some sort of attempt to intimidate the employees to vote in a certain way. |
|||||||
| baratunde | GOP Foreclosures In Michigan - Test | 0 | Sep 17 2008, 12:24 AM EDT by baratunde | ||||
|
Thread started: Sep 17 2008, 12:24 AM EDT
Watch
so here's what happened... blah blah right wing blah blah
|
|||||||